The Complete Guide to the Cost of Air Source Heat Pumps: Installation, Running Costs, and Grants
December 18, 2024
Solar Assisted Heat Pump Installation: 2025 Step-by-Step Guide and Key Considerations
January 14, 2025
Key Takeaways
- Infrared heating is a much more efficient option compared to traditional heating systems as it warms objects and people directly, rather than the surrounding air, which is particularly effective in smaller, well-insulated spaces.
- Infrared heating is cheaper than gas heating, especially in well-insulated homes. It has lower operating costs and lower installation and maintenance costs than gas central heating.
- Infrared heating is ideal for small, insulated rooms, but if yours is not insulated or too large, you have to get multiple panels or extra solutions.
- Compared to conventional radiators or electric underfloor heating, infrared heating is considerably more cost effective, especially with targeted areas. But for central heating, heat pumps or gas systems may be suitable.
- Infrared heating works using less energy and, therefore, encourages lower carbon dioxide emissions on the whole if combined with renewable energy sources.
- Infrared panels are easy to install, space-saving, and versatile, therefore, they are suitable for homes, offices, as well as outdoor settings.
Infrared heating is up-to-date technology that has become more popularly used as effective and eco-friendly heating. Infrared heating works differently from the heating systems in common use; instead of heating the air and allowing it to radiate heat to the surrounding environment, it directly heats surfaces and bodies in its way, making it more energy-efficient and creating a comfortable ambient environment. As demand for renewable energy solutions increases, infrared heating is stepping into the ring as a strong contender.
This blog will discuss the effectiveness, price, and pros and cons of infrared heating and how it compares to other systems, such as heat pumps, radiators, and underfloor heating. And we’ll help you figure out if infrared heating is right for your space.
Table Of Content
- Key Takeaways
- Table Of Content
- Pros and Cons of Infrared Heating Panels
- Is Infrared Heating Any Good?
- Is Infrared Heating Cheaper Than Gas?
- Infrared Heating vs. Heat Pumps
- Infrared Heating vs. Gas Central Heating
- Infrared Heating vs. Radiators
- Infrared Heating vs. Electric Underfloor Heating
- Choosing Infrared Heating for Your Needs
- Conclusion
- Frequently Asked Questions
Pros and Cons of Infrared Heating Panels
Pros
Energy Efficiency
Infrared panels use less energy than traditional heating systems, which warm the air rather than directly heat objects and people. This results in quicker and more efficient warmth, making the overall system energy efficient.
Ease of Installation
Infrared heating panels are usually lightweight and require little to no effort in terms of installation. They can be mounted to walls or ceilings and often do not require extensive ductwork or complicated systems, which speeds up and reduces the cost of installation.
Space-Saving Design
Infrared panels don’t take up precious floor space with their slim profile. This compact design makes them the perfect addition to smaller rooms or minimalist designs, as they can sit peacefully on walls or ceilings out of the way of living space.
Silent Operation
Infrared panels are silent compared to traditional radiators or gas heaters, which make noise when used (especially when they have integrated fans). This makes them an ideal choice for noise-sensitive spaces, including a bedroom, office, or other quiet area.
Even Heat Distribution
Infrared heating produces a uniform heat that warms individuals and things directly. This creates a more comfortable atmosphere where the heat is more evenly dispersed throughout the room and feels more natural than the often uneven warmth provided by forced air or radiators.
Pros
Upfront Cost
Infrared panels can be more expensive compared to the initial purchase and installation costs of traditional heating systems. Although they often pay off over time through energy efficiency, the upfront investment can be off-putting for some.
Limited Effectiveness in Large Spaces
Dependence on Insulation Quality
Infrared heating works best in insulated spaces. Its efficiency may be needlessly hampered by poor insulation and heat loss. Older buildings or buildings with insufficient insulation may not experience the full advantages of infrared heating.
Location-Specific Heating
Infrared panels warm objects directly in front of them. If the layout blocks the panels or furniture blocks their reach, the heating effectiveness may be reduced. In order to achieve optimal performance of panels, careful planning of their placement is required.
Maintenance Requirements
Infrared heating panels are relatively low maintenance, but a build-up of dust and dirt can significantly reduce its efficiency. They do require regular cleaning, however, to ensure their optimal functioning which may make their maintenance higher than other heating systems.
Is Infrared Heating Any Good?
Infrared heating has been very well reviewed as an energy-efficient, comfortable system of heating across many applications. Customers say they are satisfied with its ability to emit even, direct, quiet heat without the air movement of traditional heating systems. At home, infrared panels are appreciated for their silence and compactness and are very suitable for bedrooms and bathrooms.
Offices love the work-honoring and concentrated warmth it brings. Portable infrared heaters are perfect for outdoor settings, and they warm-up smaller spaces quickly. As a whole, infrared heating is seen by a high number of users to be a dependable and efficient answer to diverse requirements.
Is Infrared Heating Efficient?
The answer is yes, as infrared heating directly heats people and objects rather than the air, which makes it practical for heating. This direct heat transfer minimises energy loss, as there is no requirement to warm the whole room or to circulate warm air, which can naturally rise away through ventilation or draughts.
Infrared panels use less energy to deliver the equivalent comfort as gas heating or electric radiators. In well-insulated environments, they provide a green, economical choice. Infrared heating provides a targeted approach, using less energy and warming up faster.
Is Infrared Heating Cheaper Than Gas?
Depending on usage and energy prices, infrared heating can be less expensive than gas. In addition, infrared systems are very energy-efficient as they directly heat objects without wasting energy. Infrared heaters can be extremely cost-efficient in well-insulated houses, providing quicker heat and taking less energy than gas systems.
Gas central heating typically has a higher installation and maintenance cost than infrared heating systems as well. Where localised heating is necessary, heat panels will provide warmth and, therefore, be more economical than a gas central heating system.
Infrared Heating vs. Heat Pumps
Both systems are energy-efficient, but they work quite differently, particularly when you are comparing infrared heating vs. heat pumps. Unlike other types of heaters, infrared heaters do not waste energy because they heat objects and people (not air), and they take effect immediately. Heat pumps, on the other hand, take heat from the air or ground, which can sometimes be more efficient for whole-home heating, particularly in larger areas.
Heat pumps do have a higher upfront cost, but they actually save you money on energy bills in the long run. Both systems are eco-friendly; infrared panels use less energy in a smaller room, while heat pumps are designed for larger areas and provide more even heating across the home.
Infrared Heating vs. Gas Central Heating
Infrared heaters work by directly warming people and objects, which results in quicker and more concentrated heat with minimal energy loss. Gas central heating, however, heats air, which means the energy can be wasted — particularly in badly insulated areas.
Gas central heating, on the other hand, is more appropriate for larger spaces or heating up the entire house, while infrared systems have less expensive up-front costs and use less energy. In the long term, infrared heating can be more cost-effective because the operational costs are lower than those of traditional systems, as they can heat smaller and better-insulated areas.
Infrared Heating vs. Radiators
Infrared panels heat objects and people directly and immediately with localised heat, as well as directly around you rather than the surrounding air, and can, therefore, be more energy efficient in smaller spaces that are properly insulated. Radiators, however, heat air, which is not only slower but also can lose heat through ventilation.
Infrared panels are also easier to install because they take up little room and require no complicated piping. However, radiators can take a bit more work to install, especially if you have central heating. As such, infrared heating is generally more energy-efficient and quicker to heat dedicated spaces than conventional radiators.
Infrared Heating vs. Electric Underfloor Heating
Infrared heating can transfer warmth quickly, focusing on warming objects and people rather than air, which is extremely good for spaces that are small or should be heated to specific temperatures. Electrical underfloor heating, on the other hand, heats the entire floor, giving an even, radiant heat through the room, which can be perceived as being more comfortable, but takes longer to get up to temperature.
Electric underfloor heating can also be less economical in larger spaces. Due to decreased energy consumption, infrared heating is typically more cost-effective over time, even though both systems have similar initial installation costs.
Choosing Infrared Heating for Your Needs
Whether infrared heating is right for you depends on your space size, the installation cost, and long-term energy savings. Infrared panels are suitable for smaller, well-insulated spaces, heating you and your surrounding area directly for lower operating costs. They are simple to mount and do not require complex systems, so they can be installed in homes or offices with little space available.
However, for larger spaces, a heat pump or gas central heating may be more effective. Consider your heating aspirations — whether you’re looking for warmth for select spots/open areas or whole-home heating — and weigh the initial costs against what they may pay off in the long run.
Conclusion
Infrared heating is an energy-saving and cost-effective solution for many homes and businesses, providing immediate and targeted heat without excessive energy wastage. (That makes it ideal for smaller, more energy-efficient spaces and allows for easy installation compared to conventional systems.) Some shortcomings exist, like higher initial costs and limited effectiveness in larger spaces, but infrared heating is a strong option for localised, more sustainable heating.
Scottish Energy Saving are infrared heating experts. We can help you see if an infrared heating system would benefit your property. Get in touch with us today to discuss your options and start saving energy.
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes, infrared heating can be cheaper than gas, depending on how much the heating is used and energy prices. Infrared heating has a higher energy-efficiency rate because it heats the body and objects in a room instead of the air. This focused heat makes it more economically viable for smaller, insulated spaces. Infrared panels also have a faster warm-up time and can provide instant warmth.
Due to the fact that infrared heating systems do not need piping, conventional radiators or flues, much of the installation tends to be simpler and cheaper than gas central heating systems, which may need regular servicing and complicated pipework.
However, the total value for money will depend on the rates of your energy provider and the dimensions of the place. For larger homes, a heat pump or gas system may remain the more cost-effective choice, although when you only need to heat specific sections, infrared heating can save you significant money in the long run.
Infrared heating is most effective in smaller, properly insulated areas, but it can be effective in larger areas as well, based on the setup. In very large open-plan spaces or rooms that are not well insulated, infrared heating may struggle to heat the entire area evenly. Infrared panels do heat the air, but they work best in closed spaces where the heat can be trapped, as they are designed to heat objects and people directly rather than the air.
In open spaces, the need for several panels can drive up installation and energy costs. In these cases, infrared heating can be an auxiliary system since methods such as underfloor heating or heat pumps will work.
Infrared panels need line-of-sight to work their best, so planning and placement are essential to getting the most out of them. On the other hand, if you have a large space that is poorly insulated, infrared heating may not be the most cost-effective solution alone.
One of the most useful features is its direct heating — infrared panels warm people and objects directly rather than the air. This leads to quicker, more effective warming since there is very little heat lost. By contrast, traditional radiators heat the air, which can lead to heat losses through ventilation or drafts, especially in wider or less insulated areas.
Infrared heating is also more energy-efficient, as it takes less energy to heat up a room, making it a cheaper option in the long run. Radiant heat systems tend to be a few inches thick at a minimum, while infrared panels offer a more slimline, modern alternative that won't take up much space and can integrate seamlessly into a room rather than being an upright eyesore like traditional radiators. Infrared heating is also silent and does not provide the noise associated with the radiators.
